Testwala logoTestwala
HomeMocksPracticePYQsDashboard
Testwala logoTestwala

Timing-accurate mock tests and PYQs for SSC, Banking and Railway exams — so the real paper feels like a revision.

Exams

  • SSC exams
  • Banking exams
  • Railway exams
  • All exams

Practice

  • Practice questions
  • Mock test series
  • Sectional tests
  • Year-wise PYQs
  • Performance analytics

Company

  • About us
  • Help Centre
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Contact

  • hello@testwala.co.in
  • Telegram
  • +91 62816 87760

Practice interface modeled on the official exam pattern — not the official examination. Testwala is not affiliated with the Staff Selection Commission, IBPS, SBI, RBI, NABARD, SEBI or Indian Railways.

© 2026 Testwala. All rights reserved.

Built for aspirants, by aspirants.

HomeMocksPracticeStats
  1. Home
  2. ›
  3. PYQs
  4. ›
  5. ibps-so
  6. ›
  7. 2019
  8. ›
  9. Q265

ibps-so 2019 · Question 265 of 300

A note of the compliance department upon the classification of negotiable paper opens with the two propositions set out below. Statements : All cheques are drafts. All drafts are instruments. Conclusions : I. All cheques are instruments. II. Some instruments are cheques.

  1. AOnly conclusion I follows
  2. BOnly conclusion II follows
  3. CEither conclusion I or conclusion II follows
  4. DNeither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
  5. EBoth conclusion I and conclusion II followCorrect

Answer: E. Both conclusion I and conclusion II follow

Official answer key verified. Detailed explanation coming soon.

Source: IBPS SO Prelims Memory Based 2019 (held 28 Dec 2019, Shift 2) - Prepp · memory-based

← Q264View full paper (300 questions)Q266 →

Practice the full ibps-so 2019 paper

Timed test with all 300 questions, just like the real exam.

Start test