PYQPulse
HomeMocksPracticePYQsDashboard
PYQPulse

Timing-accurate mock tests and PYQs for SSC, Banking and Railway exams — so the real paper feels like a revision.

Exams

  • SSC exams
  • Banking exams
  • Railway exams
  • All exams

Practice

  • Practice questions
  • Mock test series
  • Sectional tests
  • Year-wise PYQs
  • Performance analytics

Company

  • About us
  • Help Centre
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Contact

  • hello@testwala.co.in
  • Telegram
  • +91 62816 87760

Practice interface modeled on the official exam pattern — not the official examination. PYQPulse is not affiliated with the Staff Selection Commission, IBPS, SBI, RBI, NABARD, SEBI or Indian Railways.

© 2026 PYQPulse. All rights reserved.

Built for aspirants, by aspirants.

HomeMocksPracticeStats
  1. Home
  2. ›
  3. PYQs
  4. ›
  5. ibps-so
  6. ›
  7. 2019
  8. ›
  9. Q264

ibps-so 2019 · Question 264 of 300

The scheme was withdrawn within a year because the response to it had been ______.

  1. Aoverwhelming
  2. Bimmediate
  3. CnegligibleCorrect
  4. Dfavourable
  5. Eunanimous Directions (Q97–Q105) : The propositions that follow are of the kind met with in the compliance notes of a bank, where a general rule and a particular observation are set side by side. In each of the questions below there are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You are to take the two statements to be true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then to decide which of the two conclusions, if either, follows from the statements given.

Answer: C. negligible

Official answer key verified. Detailed explanation coming soon.

Source: IBPS SO Prelims Memory Based 2019 (held 28 Dec 2019, Shift 2) - Prepp · memory-based

← Q263View full paper (300 questions)Q265 →

Practice the full ibps-so 2019 paper

Timed test with all 300 questions, just like the real exam.

Start test